| Introduction
I have heard it over and over; people in the financial
media presenting information on the bond markets continually
make erroneous assumptions about the relationship
of mortgage interest rates with US Treasury Bond and
Note prices. This happens because these financial
reporters may understand the bond markets in general
but they are not mortgage experts and do not fully
understand how mortgage interest rates are determined.
For example, the bond market reporters mistakenly
tie mortgage rates to the performance of the US 10-year
Treasury Note on a routine basis. You see this happen
all the time. In reality, mortgage interest rates
and the intra-day re-pricing that occur are determined
from the performance of mortgage-backed securities
(MBS or mortgage bonds), not US 10-year Treasury Notes.
Performance Comparisons
The table below illustrates data for the month of
May 2003. During the 21 trading days in May, the two
securities moved in the same direction 18 times but
actually moved in the opposite direction three times.
If you were watching the US Treasury notes to determine
the way mortgage pricing would respond, you would
have had a couple of pretty big misses on some of
those days (see chart below). Moreover, on the 18
days when they did move in a similar direction, the
relative change was close on only 6 of the 18 dates.
So the two securities behaved closely on only 6 of
a total of 21 trading days (just 28%). The relative
change between the two was never exact! On 12 of the
18 days when the two instruments moved in a like direction,
the difference in the amount of the move was significantly
different. This could have caused client confusion,
client frustration and poor or incorrect guidance
by the originator to his or her customer.
 |
|
| Performance
Comparison Chart |
| Date |
US 10-yr note |
$ Change |
% Change |
Direction |
FNMA 5.5% |
$ Change |
% Change |
| 30-Apr-03 |
$100.28 |
- |
- |
- |
$102.75 |
- |
- |
| 1-May-03 |
$100.25 |
($0.03) |
-0.03% |
Same |
$102.72 |
($0.03) |
-0.03% |
| 2-May-03 |
$99.58 |
($0.67) |
-0.67% |
Same |
$102.56 |
($0.16) |
-0.16% |
| 5-May-03 |
$99.95 |
$0.37 |
0.37% |
Same |
$102.69 |
$0.13 |
0.13% |
| 6-May-03 |
$100.70 |
$0.75 |
0.75% |
Same |
$103.09 |
$0.40 |
0.39% |
| 7-May-03 |
$101.61 |
$0.91 |
0.90% |
Same |
$103.31 |
$0.22 |
0.21% |
| 8-May-03 |
$101.66 |
$0.05 |
0.05% |
Same |
$103.34 |
$0.03 |
0.03% |
| 9-May-03 |
$99.53 |
($2.13) |
-2.10% |
Opposite |
$103.41 |
$0.07 |
0.07% |
| 12-May-03 |
$99.88 |
$0.35 |
0.35% |
Opposite |
$103.13 |
($0.28) |
-0.27% |
| 13-May-03 |
$100.14 |
$0.26 |
0.26% |
Same |
$103.28 |
$0.15 |
0.15% |
| 14-May-03 |
$100.85 |
$0.71 |
0.71% |
Same |
$103.53 |
$0.25 |
0.24% |
| 15-May-03 |
$100.77 |
($0.08) |
-0.08% |
Same |
$103.47 |
($0.06) |
-0.06% |
| 16-May-03 |
$101.71 |
$0.94 |
0.93% |
Same |
$103.72 |
$0.25 |
0.24% |
| 19-May-03 |
$101.15 |
($0.56) |
-0.55% |
Same |
$103.69 |
($0.03) |
-0.03% |
| 20-May-03 |
$102.26 |
$1.11 |
1.10% |
Same |
$103.72 |
$0.03 |
0.03% |
| 21-May-03 |
$101.90 |
($0.36) |
-0.35% |
Same |
$103.50 |
($0.22) |
-0.21% |
| 22-May-03 |
$102.61 |
$0.71 |
0.70% |
Same |
$103.66 |
$0.16 |
0.15% |
| 23-May-03 |
$102.41 |
($0.20) |
-0.19% |
Same |
$103.56 |
($0.10) |
-0.10% |
| 27-May-03 |
$101.73 |
($0.68) |
-0.66% |
Same |
$103.50 |
($0.06) |
-0.06% |
| 28-May-03 |
$101.63 |
($0.10) |
-0.10% |
Opposite |
$103.59 |
$0.09 |
0.09% |
| 29-May-03 |
$102.41 |
$0.78 |
0.77% |
Same |
$103.75 |
$0.16 |
0.15% |
| 30-May-03 |
$102.11 |
($0.30) |
-0.29% |
Same |
$103.66 |
($0.09) |
-0.09% |
| |
|
$1.83 |
0.02% |
|
|
$0.91 |
0.88% |
|
|
 |
|
|
Let’s take a retrospective look at the similarities
and differences between two charts, one showing the
10-Year Treasury note and the other the Fannie Mae
30-Year Spot 5.5% Bond. The first chart shows the
past performance of the 10-Year Treasury note and
the second chart shows the corresponding monthly performance
of the Fannie Mae 30-Year Spot 5.5% Bond (FNMA). One
similarity that sticks out is the overall upward trend
in both charts. One of the differences is the daily
volatility characterized by the length of the daily
candlesticks – the 10-Year Treasury note tends
to be more volatile than the Fannie Mae 30-Year Spot
5.5% Bond.
US 10-yr Note

FNMA 5.5% Mortgage Bond

It is interesting to note that both charts have an
overall upward trend for the month of May 2003. I
do agree that they will have similar trends. However,
this comparison between the charts shows quite a daily
difference. The two charts really do not look very
similar at all, especially once you look at the 25-day
Moving Average (the red line). Using the FNMA chart
does provide a definite advantage in giving your customer
the correct information. My contention is you need
every edge you can get to provide a pricing advantage
for your business and your clients. By using the FNMA
bond to guide in decision making over the use of the
10-year Treasury note, you will have a decided edge
over those who only use the 10-year Treasury note
as a pricing guide. The net effect will be increased
market awareness on your part and the perception of
increased market expertise in the eyes of your clients. |